Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the OS-Chichester Observer site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hambrook housing would have been an assault on 'strategic gap'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 October 2008
Strong local objections have helped to scotch proposals for 23 new homes at Hambrook.
Chichester District Council planning officers recommended approval, but the southern area development control committee voted 12-1 to refuse permission on the grounds the scheme was in an unsustainable location, and went against the local development
plan.

A representative of Chidham and Hambrook Parish Council said the site, in The Avenue, would be an assault on the 'strategic gap' around Hambrook.

The parish council was not against additional housing, but this was the wrong place for it, and there were other more suitable locations in the village.

Southern Water had not solved local sewage problems, and flooding also occurred on a regular basis.

Cllr Myles Cullen, representing the local area, said the application faced 'opposition on a grand scale', and he believed this was fully justified.

"We cannot be blind to the need for affordable housing, but this application lacks credibility as a suitable sustainable development," he added.

"This is not warranted in a strategic gap."

Cllr Pieter Montyn said that all this would be was a dormitory site, with no facilities at all, and he could not go along with it.

Cllr Mary Marrs said the site was the wrong place for development, and Cllr Fred Robertson, who proposed refusal, said it was in conflict with the development plan.

The project also faced opposition from Chichester Harbour Conservancy, which said it had strong concerns over the closeness of the development to the harbour's Bosham and Thorney channels, which were nationally protected landscapes.

Disturbance to wildfowl and waders could be increased.



What do you think? Click here to send a letter or leave a comment below.

Click here to go back to Chichester news
Click here to go back to Bognor Regis news
Click here to go back to Midhurst and Petworth news

To tell us where in the world you are reading this story click on the link below to add yourself to our readers' map.

MAP







The full article contains 342 words and appears in OS-Chichester Observer newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 October 2008 1:24 PM
  • Source: OS-Chichester Observer
  • Location: Chichester
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.