Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Success for Haywards Heath Referendum Group



View Video
Download Video

Video

Video by B.Morris/B.Churcher
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 June 2008
Earlier this week, members of the Haywards Heath Referendum Group dropped into the Mid Sussex Times offices, voicing concerns that their campaign wasn't getting the news coverage they felt it deserved.
They need not have worried, as residents flocked to the polls yesterday to vote on the way Mid Sussex District Council has handled the town's 'masterplan'.

It seems that anyone who hadn't seen one of the huge 'Vote YES - Haywards Heath Referendum' banners dotted about town, must have heard councillor Paddy Henry being driven around town with a loudspeaker during voting hours. "Don't forget to vote in tonight's referendum..."

Polling stations were certainly not deserted, as the referendum group may have feared and the district council had perhaps hoped. Instead, the group says that 4,289 people voted in the referendum with 4,053
supporting the demand for a rethink and proper consultation on plans for the new station quarter.

According to the group's figures, there was a 21.8 per cent turnout, with 94 per cent voting yes. Coincidentally, Thornfield Properties Ltd, which is responsible for drawing up plans to revitalise the town centre in partnership with the district council, claimed earlier this week that 94 per cent, an "overwhelming majority" of the community, want to see the station site developed and the public were broadly supportive of the current concept scheme.

But after yesterday's vote, there will be considerable pressure on Thornfield and the district council to reconsider their plans. While results of the referendum are not binding, it will be difficult for it to be dismissed by the council.

Councillor Brian Hall, one of the main protagonists of the referendum, said: "The council spent well over £4,000 of public money in putting its case to the electorate and it was found seriously wanting.

"The ruling group must think again and stop neglecting the interests of
Haywards Heath. The community has spoken strongly. The plans on offer would create traffic chaos and a massive diminution of public well-being.

"Clair Hall is threatened with closure for at least 29 months and in
one seriously considered scenario would be closed for good. The ball is now back in the council's court. We need real improvements to the
station and without paying a huge cost to the public."

Please sign up below to add your views and comments on this article and give your views on the referendum. It is free to register, and once you have done so you can add views to any of our online articles. Click on the green 'play' button to view our video report on the referendum.

The full article contains 441 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 June 2008 12:12 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mid Sussex
 
Prev
1
Next
1

lochnessie,

Haywards Heath 20/06/2008 19:37:24
Haywards Heath does not need anymore flat pack ikea job flats or houses. We have enough as it is. There are not enough emenities for these hundreds of extra people. Doctors and schools etc.

What HH does need though is leisure facilities. Why cant we have bowling and a cinema on the station site?? There is nothing in hh for children, apart from a few parks..

As for Claire Hall being shut down for more poxy flats, thats redicilus. We aldready have travel far away for decent shops, cinemas and bowling but not everybody can drive so have to rely on public transport. What about the elderly and disabled who find it difficult/impossible to get on trains??

scrap this developement and listen to the residents of this town. we NEED Leisure facilities, not more properties, oh and decent shops!!!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.