Plans for 320 new homes on the southern edge of Haywards Heath have been approved despite concerns developers are ‘ripping up the countryside’.
Outline planning permission was granted for land south of Rocky Lane by Mid Sussex District Council’s District Planning Committee last night (Thursday March 16).
Concerns were raised about the impact of extra traffic and the impact of new homes on the ancient woodland, with 53 letters of objection received.
Roger Brocklehurst, a committee member of the Fox Hill Residents’ Association, described how the current housing system was ‘broken’, adding: “Local residents feel that our council has failed us in not putting in place a robust housing plan for Mid Sussex which leaves us vulnerable to this type of speculative development.”
He described the disappointment that the Woodland Trust’s recommendation’s had been ‘totally ignored’. suggesting the application represented ‘ripping up the countryside’.
Officers explained that parts of the site were in both the emerging Mid Sussex district plan and the approved Haywards Heath neighbourhood plan.
The scheme includes 30 per cent affordable housing and a right turn priority junction into the development.
Tim Rodway, acting as agent for the developer, described how the scheme offered ‘significant benefits’ to the district and the local area, and would be ‘attractive, well-laid out and sensitive to local circumstances’.
Phillip Coote (Con, Crawley Down and Turners Hill) said it would be ‘very difficult’ to argue against the scheme since it was in the town’s neighbourhood plan, but questioned the amount of extra traffic and described being ‘disturbed’ by Southern Water’s comments about not being able to ‘cope’ with the new houses.
County council highways officers said that the new traffic would not have a significant impact on the A272, prompting laughter in the public gallery.
A survey had been carried out for Rocky Lane indicating average speeds of around 34 to 35 miles per hour.
Councillors were told that the buffer space between the new homes would be agreed at the reserved matters stage, while Southern Water had a statutory obligation to serve any new properties.
Anthony Watts Williams (Con, Hurstpierpoint and Downs) asked if the density of 28 dwellings per hectare for the scheme was too low, adding: “If we carry on giving permission in the built up areas for this density all we are doing is pushing future development outside the built up areas potentially.”
Robert Salisbury (Con, Cuckfield), chairman of the committee, explained that the scheme had large constraints such as the ancient woodland and hedgerows.
Meanwhile officers described the need to ‘make sure development fits into the local environment as best we can’.
The application was approved unanimously.
Afterwards several residents in the gallery muttered ‘shame on you’.
Don’t miss out on all the latest breaking news where you live.
Here are four ways you can be sure you’ll be amongst the first to know what’s going on.
1) Make our website your homepage at www.midsussextimes.co.uk
2) Like our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/midsussextimes
3) Follow us on Twitter @midsussex_times
4) Register with us by clicking on ‘sign in’ (top right corner). You can then receive our daily newsletter AND add your point of view to stories that you read here.
And do share with your family and friends - so they don’t miss out!
The Mid Sussex Times - always the first with your local news.
Be part of it.